The ICARA Process Explained: A Practical Guide for MiFID Investment Firms

What the ICARA process is

The ICARA process is the collective term for the systems and controls a firm operates to identify and manage the potential material harms that arise from running its business, and to make sure the business can be wound down in an orderly way. MIFIDPRU 7.4.9R sets out this baseline obligation, requiring appropriate systems and controls to identify, monitor and, where proportionate, reduce all material potential harms from both ongoing operations and wind-down.

MIFIDPRU 7.4.3G frames the overall purpose: the ICARA framework exists to ensure a firm holds financial resources that are adequate for the business it undertakes and can wind down without threatening the integrity of the wider UK financial system. MIFIDPRU 7.4.10R makes the process proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the firm's activities, so a small adviser and a large broker-dealer will run very different ICARAs.

For firms now inside the IFPR, the ICARA substantively replaced the ICAAP. The important shift is that the ICARA is not only a capital-modelling exercise. It combines capital assessment, liquidity assessment and wind-down planning in one place, and it is explicitly built around the concept of harm rather than around a fixed regulatory formula.

The overall financial adequacy rule

The rule everything else serves is the overall financial adequacy rule. MIFIDPRU 7.4.7R requires a firm to hold, at all times, own funds and liquid assets that are adequate, both as to their amount and their quality, to achieve two outcomes. First, the firm must be able to remain financially viable throughout the economic cycle, with the ability to address any material potential harm from its ongoing activities. Second, the firm's business must be capable of being wound down in an orderly manner, minimising harm to consumers and other market participants.

This is a continuous obligation, not a year-end snapshot. The phrase adequate as to amount and quality matters: holding the right headline number is not enough if the resources are illiquid or of poor quality when they are needed. Depending on the harms a firm identifies, the only realistic way to comply may be to hold additional own funds or additional liquid assets above the firm's minimum own funds requirement or basic liquid assets requirement.

The overall financial adequacy rule supplements the FCA's threshold conditions and Principle 4 on financial prudence, per MIFIDPRU 7.4.2G. It is the standard the FCA uses to judge whether a firm holds adequate financial resources overall.

Identifying harm

Harm identification is the engine of the ICARA. MIFIDPRU 7.4.13R requires a firm to assess its business model and identify all the material harms that could arise from both the ongoing operation of the business and its winding-down. Everything downstream, the capital number, the liquidity number and the wind-down plan, flows from this assessment.

The guidance in MIFIDPRU 7.4.14G groups potential harms into categories: harm to clients and counterparties, harm to the markets in which the firm operates, and harm to the firm itself. The categories interact, because a disruption or loss at the firm can quickly become a harm to its clients. The FCA has been clear in its IFPR implementation observations that it expects a holistic assessment of harms, extending beyond the standardised K-factor requirements to capture harms those factors do not address.

A common weakness the FCA has flagged is treating harm identification as a box-ticking list rather than a genuine analysis of how the specific firm could damage clients, markets or itself. The stronger approach ties each identified harm to a mitigating action, and only then to the residual capital or liquidity a firm needs to hold.

Threshold requirements: own funds and liquid assets

Once harms are identified, the ICARA translates them into two numbers. The own funds threshold requirement (OFTR) is the amount of own funds a firm needs at any given time to comply with the overall financial adequacy rule. MIFIDPRU 7.6.4G explains that this is the higher of the amount needed to fund ongoing business operations, allowing for periods of financial stress, and the amount needed to wind the firm down in an orderly manner. In practice the OFTR is the firm's own funds requirement plus any additional own funds needed for residual material harms, and it can never be set below the minimums in MIFIDPRU 4.

The liquid assets threshold requirement (LATR) works the same way for liquidity. MIFIDPRU 7.7.3G defines it as the amount of liquid assets a firm needs at any given time to comply with the overall financial adequacy rule, made up of the basic liquid assets requirement plus the higher of the liquid assets needed to support ongoing operations under stress or the additional liquid assets needed to fund an orderly wind-down. MIFIDPRU 7.7.2R asks firms to produce a reasonable estimate of the maximum liquid assets needed across the coming period.

When the ICARA produces a higher figure than the baseline requirements, that higher figure becomes the firm's threshold requirement and represents the firm's own view of what the overall financial adequacy rule demands, unless the FCA advises otherwise. The FCA has stressed that liquidity timing matters, and that firms should look at intra-day, inter-day, weekly and monthly cash positions rather than a single point estimate.

Stress testing, wind-down and recovery

Capital and liquidity planning sit at the front of MIFIDPRU 7.5. MIFIDPRU 7.5.2R requires a firm to have a clearly articulated business model and strategy, a risk appetite aligned to that model, and a forward-looking view of the own funds and liquid assets needed to meet the overall financial adequacy rule, including whether it would still hold enough under severe but plausible stress.

Stress testing tests exactly that. Under the guidance in MIFIDPRU 7.5.4G, firms with more complex business models are expected to carry out in-depth stress testing and reverse stress testing, the latter working backwards from the point at which the business becomes unviable. Recovery planning, under MIFIDPRU 7.5.5R, asks the firm to set the capital and liquidity levels at which a breach of the threshold requirements becomes a credible risk, and to identify credible recovery actions that would restore its position.

Wind-down planning closes the loop. MIFIDPRU 7.5.7R requires a firm to identify the steps and resources needed to wind down and terminate its business in an orderly way, along with the harms that could arise during the process. The wind-down trigger is the point at which the firm should stop trying to recover and begin winding down. MIFIDPRU 7.5.10G indicates the FCA would expect a firm to commence wind-down once it falls below its wind-down triggers, unless its governing body has determined there is an imminent and credible likelihood of recovery.

Review, board approval and MIF007

The ICARA is a living process, not a one-off document. MIFIDPRU 7.8.2R requires a firm to review its ICARA process at least once every 12 months, and additionally after any material change in its business model or operating model. The output is captured in the ICARA document, which MIFIDPRU 7.8.7R requires the firm to prepare and which must cover, among other things, the material harms identified, how the firm complies with the overall financial adequacy rule, a summary of stress testing and reverse stress testing, the levels indicating a credible breach of threshold requirements, the recovery actions available and an overview of wind-down planning.

Ownership sits firmly with the top of the firm. MIFIDPRU 7.8.8R requires the firm's governing body to review and approve the ICARA document within a reasonable period after the review, and to specifically review and approve the key assumptions that underpin it. This is not a delegation-friendly exercise: the board or equivalent body must engage with the substance.

The FCA collects the results through data item MIF007, the ICARA assessment questionnaire, which gives it a snapshot of the firm's financial position against the overall financial adequacy rule. A firm must submit MIF007 within 20 business days of its governing body approving the ICARA document, and at least once every 12 months. Beyond the return, the FCA can run a SREP under MIFIDPRU 7.10 to assess the adequacy of a firm's own funds and liquid assets, and it can require additional own funds or liquid assets where it judges the firm's own assessment falls short.

Conclusion

The ICARA process is where governance, risk and prudential capital meet. Done well, it is not a compliance chore but a genuine board-level view of the harms a firm can cause, the resources it needs to absorb them, and the plan for closing down cleanly if recovery is not credible. The overall financial adequacy rule ties the whole exercise together, and the own funds and liquid assets threshold requirements are simply the numbers that rule produces.

The firms that get the most value treat the ICARA as a year-round discipline: harms are reassessed as the business changes, stress scenarios reflect real vulnerabilities, wind-down triggers are set before they are needed, and the governing body challenges the key assumptions rather than rubber-stamping them. If you want help building or reviewing an ICARA that stands up to FCA scrutiny, explore our prudential and control support or request a demo to see how Nasara Connect can help.

Frequently asked questions